27-Year-Old Tennis Pro Abandons Match Amid Bizarre Court Conditions

转载声明：本文转载自 EssentiallySports，版权归原作者及原媒体所有。

Camilo Ugo Carabelli was in no mood to listen as he gathered his belongings and headed for the exit. “Cami, Cami!” the umpire called out, desperately trying to get the Argentine to stop and come back. But Carabelli wasn’t turning around, leaving behind some truly bizarre scenes at the Guayaquil Challenger in Ecuador. And here is the thing: this is not the first time he has pulled out such an act.

Watch What’s Trending Now!

The incident took place during Carabelli’s quarterfinal against Brazil’s Joao Lucas Reis da Silva. The World No. 75 had entered the tournament as the top seed, but with the opening set tied at 5-5, he decided he had seen enough.

Bewildered to watch him pack up and leave without any intimation, the umpire tried to stop him and understand what the crux of the issue was. To which he reportedly said, “FIX THE COURT.” Not just that.

He also expressed his anger over the persistent rain as he collected his belongings and walked off.

Now, heavy rain over the previous two days has disrupted the tournament schedule and affected the conditions at the clay-court event. And it could be a genuine reason, but it could also be that his frustration peaked at that point, given how the game was unfolding.

Carabelli had initially taken a 3-2 lead after breaking Reis da Silva, but the Brazilian fought back to level the score. The Argentine then regained the advantage after saving three break points, only for Reis da Silva to break back once again.

One moment was especially frustrating for the 27-year-old. He slipped near the baseline while attempting a return, sending the ball into the net. Then, shortly after that, he packed up and left. Reis da Silva was still preparing for his next service game and initially appeared unaware that his opponent had walked away!

Given that he didn’t retire because of any injury, this was not treated as a routine one. The match supervisor was called, and the Argentine was defaulted for failing to continue. Reis da Silva, ranked No. 186 at the time, was declared the winner and advanced to the semifinals without completing the first set.

The decision turned an already unusual quarterfinal into a costly exit for the tournament favorite. Carabelli forfeited the 12 ATP ranking points and $3,095 in prize money he had earned by reaching the quarterfinals. The Brazilian, meanwhile, secured his place in the final four.

The Challenger Tour is supposed to be where players battle for crucial ranking points, hoping to use the competition as a stepping stone towards the ATP Tour. But it seems Camilo Ugo Carabelli didn’t quite get the memo, and this wasn’t the first time he did something bizzare.

What makes the incident even more unsual is that Carabelli had already made headlines for a similar decision at the previous Challenger tournament he played.

At the Cancun Challenger in Mexico, shortly before the US Open, the Argentine faced Tunisia’s Moez Echargui in the second round. Despite being separated by almost 300 places in the world rankings, it was Echargui who controlled the match. The Tunisian won eight consecutive games to lead 6-2, 5-0 lead. With just one game separating him from victory, Carabelli unexpectedly retired from the contest.

The timing of course, raised eyebrows, as Echargui was already on the verge of completing the win. The Tunisian eventually advanced, while Carabelli went on to compete at the US Open, where he lost in straight sets to Germany’s Jan-Lennard Struff in the first round. Sure, the circumstances were different; the Cancun retirement and the Guayaquil default have now certainly put the narrative of him being a hot-headed player.

Carabelli was not the first player to voice concerns about the playing conditions at the tournament. Just days earlier, fellow Argentine Alex Barrena had a tense exchange with chair umpire Jimmy Pinoargote during his first-round match against Peru’s Gonzalo Bueno. Barrena repeatedly slipped on the court and became increasingly frustrated with the surface during the opening-set tiebreak. His complaint was direct: “You can’t play here! How many times do we have to say it?” The incident was reported by Match Tenis .

Barrena was trailing 1-5 in the tiebreak when he slipped and lost a point. He then called for tournament supervisor Ricardo Reis, unhappy with what he viewed as a lack of action. The exchange escalated when Pinoargote reportedly responded, “If you want to fight, fight with me.” The dispute drew attention beyond the match itself, particularly because Barrena said he and Bueno had both suffered repeated slips on the surface.

Unlike Carabelli, Barrena did not walk away from his match. After the supervisor assessed the situation, the contest was moved to Court 2. Play resumed, and Bueno eventually won 7-6(1), 6-3. The court change did not reverse the result, but the incident had already put the conditions at the Guayaquil Challenger under scrutiny.

The two incidents were separate matches, and the available reports do not establish that they took place on the same physical court. However, both involved complaints about playing conditions at the same tournament, with heavy rain reported in the days before Carabelli’s quarterfinal. Barrena’s protest had already shown that the surface was a source of concern before Carabelli made the more dramatic decision to leave.

Carabelli’s departure raises a difficult question for tournament officials: when does a player’s concern about court safety require intervention, and what happens when a player decides the conditions are no longer acceptable? His decision brought an immediate sporting penalty, but the earlier complaints mean the Guayaquil controversy cannot be viewed solely as one player’s frustration.